Gurbani summary 8
Mayawati and Memorial Parks in Lucknow
Mayawati gained a lot of publicity, good as well as bad, because of the parks, statues and memorials she built in Lucknow during her first complete term as the CM of UP from 2007 to 2012. By sanctioning the construction of these landscapes in elite urban spaces, Mayawati was creating a memory of a shared glorious past and was providing visibility to a community that has been oppressed for millennia. How many spaces in India are dedicated to the Dalits in acknowledging their struggle anyway? By putting up statues of Baba Saheb, Ramabai, Buddha and other Dalit political leaders of the past she is trying to generate political consciousness within the community.
The grandiose of these parks, statues, pillars and sculptures dwarf individuals and reinforce the extra-human scale of the buildings and diminish the sense of self, giving more dominance and power to the structures. Adaption of Buddhist architecture also represents the rejection of Hinduism’s exploitative and hierarchical caste system. These landscapes are symbolic of the changing times they mark the socio-political change brought in by the BSP leaders. The statues of medieval saints like Kabir, Ghasida, Ravidas and warriors like Munda are also representative of the Dalits strength and the progress and greatness achieved in the face of extreme adversity and thus become landscapes of empowerment.
These structures did not only serve as a symbol of empowerment for Dalits but also an investment for her party to gain votes. But unfortunately in 2012 Mayawati was voted out of power and criticized building these landscapes of empowerment and favouring Dalit and OBC contractors over others. I completely agree with the author when they say that there are other ways to empower the community. Growing up in Lucknow this is what I have always believed. As much I think you cannot avoid the parks and statues wherever you go in the city and make you think of Mayawati and her party I think a better investment would have been safeguarding the future of the community by opening schools, formulating slum relocation schemes and increasing employment opportunities for all.
It is only the rural Dalits that see these parks as harbingers of economic and social elevation. The urban Dalit population sees through the façade of symbolic representation and yearns for more. Especially the younger Dalit population is frustrated with the little advance the community has made under the BSP and does not view these parks as symbols of hope and pride. I believe that these structures do mean a lot when it comes to the Dalit community claiming the public sphere but I also feel that the space and huge sums of money invested in these projects leaves one feeling frustrated like it was a wasted opportunity. The structures only serve as symbolic capital for the community but fail to do anything substantial in filling the deep gaps in the society.
Comments
Post a Comment