Abhinav Singh Week 3
Abhinav Singh
20141297
20141297
Seeking Begumpura: The Social
Vision of Anticaste Intellectuals
This book is a study of socioeconomic perspectives of the leading
anti-caste intellectuals. From the two chapters we have to summarize this week,
first I would like to write a synopsis
on the chapter Kabir and Ravidas
(Envisioning Begumpura). In this chapter, the author talks about two
visionary subaltern saints who though had the same guru Ramadas but had very contrasting
approaches to life. Both men were born in Banaras and belonged to lower muslim
and hindu castes respectively, in contrast to Kabir’s sharpness and
denunciatory individuality, Raidas appears in almost all the extant songs as
serene. Ravidas is the one who gave the term Begumpura, a city without any
taxes or private property or political torture, basically a city without any
sorrows. In the poetry of both
these radical voices of social protest in a medieval socio-political milieu,
there is strong urge to remove hostility and inequality between castes and
religions. They are not hoping for an obliteration of their existence but a
re-working of the exploitative and unequal relationship that were binding them
together. As the caste system was inextricably tied to the way material
production was organised in medieval times, it was obviously a Utopia that
could be aspired for but not achieved. Yet, both these saints gave voice to the
oppressed castes, using a religious and spiritual vocabulary and arousing a
sense of self-confidence and human identity among the oppressed and depressed
castes.
The second
chapter I would like to discuss is Ambedkar
(Prabuddha Bharat). In this chapter, the author discusses Ambedkar’s
evolution from being a Marxist to turning to more liberal Buddhism. Ambedkar in
the early nineteenth century was a integral part of the leftist movements in
India, which led to his inclination towards Marx but this didn’t suffice for a
long period as he saw the complexity caste can have on the united working class
of Marx, which will then derail this movement in India as unification of the
working class is only possible in a caste-less society. Ambedkar thus turned to
Buddhism as the solution for the utopian India, Ambedkar’s India was an enlightened India,
which believes in freethinking traditions, where you can challenge the
religious books and restore the freedom to individual to decide about his life
and choices. Ambedkar’s India does not believe in the ‘sanctity’ of ‘dogmas’
whether political or religious. The centrality of Ambedkar’s India was the restoration
of human dignity and human rights for all and without that all ideals and
political philosophies would be clear humbug, it was this India he termed as
the Prabuddha Bharat.
Comments
Post a Comment