Abhijay Srekanth- Week 2
Reflections on Week 2
Readings
The dialogs around caste issues are often transcoded into
non-caste centric dialogs. It’s this idea in the Caravan’s piece on the
anti-CAA coverage that really caught my eye. Erasure of a groups unique experience aid in
the continuances of said groups unique oppressive structures. The intersectional
critique to social reform movements is exactly on these grounds- a
grand-unified anti-oppressive movement does not take into account multiple interacting
systems of oppression. Prof. Sumit Baudh in fact hits on exactly this in his
piece on intersectional approaches to caste and gender in India.
The piece points out how terming the CAA/NRC debacle as
communal erases caste experiences. The ruling governments actions aren’t purely
pro-hindu- they’re pro-upper caste Hindu. Lower caste groups have often tried
escaping the caste system by escaping hindusim and converting. So called
communal violence such as the Christian Massacre in Odisha are in fact
lower-caste massacres by an unrelenting violent upper-caste.
The impacts of the CAA/NRC impact lower caste groups just as
badly as they do not possess the requisite documents nor the means to access to
adequate legal representation to protect their interests. By terming the State’s
actions a communal (i.e hindu v muslim), it automatically ends any possible discourse
about how the oppressed within the hindu fold are just as badly affected.
Comments
Post a Comment